Background & Parties
- Plaintiff/Petitioner: Dennis Kivuti Mungai, a widower married under Kiembu customs.
- Defendant/Respondent: Attorney General representing the State.
- The case concerns Section 29(c) of the Succession Act, which requires a widower to prove he was being maintained by his deceased wife in order to inherit from her estate, whereas widows face no similar burden.
⚖️ Key Legal Issue
- Whether Section 29(c) discriminates against men by imposing an unfair burden of proof for inheritance, thus violating constitutional rights and principles of equality under Article 27 of the Constitution.
📌 Facts & Allegations
- Mungai and his late wife, Caroline Wawira, married in April 2002, under customary law, and had two children. Wawira tragically died on July 24, 2023 standardmedia.co.ke.
- Following her death, Mungai claimed he was excluded by the deceased’s family during burial and denied inheritance rights.
- The core grievance: Section 29(c) unfairly requires a widower to prove maintenance by the deceased wife, whereas widows automatically qualify as dependents standardmedia.co.ke.
🧑⚖️ Petitioner’s Arguments
- The requirement is sex-based discrimination, violating Article 27 (equality before the law).
- It imposes an unfair burden on widowers, denying them equal succession rights standardmedia.co.ke.
- Mungai urged the court to declare the section unconstitutional and direct Parliament to amend it for gender equality.
🚨 Status
- As of the last report (June 2025), the suit is pending in the High Court.
- No judgment has been issued yet; proceedings on equality and constitutional interpretation continue.
👩⚖️ Constitutional Implications
- If successful, the case could reshape succession law, harmonizing it with constitutional gender equality mandates.
- It highlights the tension between customary/succession law and modern constitutional protections under Article 27.
Next Steps:
- Follow-up judicial updates once the High Court gives directions or judgment.
- Monitor whether the Attorney General defends the status quo or concedes constitutional flaws.
No comments:
Post a Comment